Bachelor's Thesis

Data Backup and Data Storage

Final Thesis 1.36 MB

Author of thesis: Bc. Petr Uhlíř

Acad. year: 2012/2013

Supervisor: Ing. Jiří Kříž, Ph.D.

Reviewer: RNDr. Tomáš Svoboda

Abstract:

This thesis aims to clarify developments in backup, recovery and long-term storage of data on a general level and in the specific project NDK. Further notes on global trends in this field and discusses the idea of long-term storage, storage system and life cycles of this repository. Marginal manner the standardization used in this store.

Keywords:

Storage format standards, computer network, validation, extraction, change formats, backup

Date of defence

20.6.2013

Result of the defence

Defended (thesis was successfully defended)

znakmkaEznamka

Grade

E

Process of defence

Otázky vedoucího práce – odpovězeno Otázky oponenta práce - odpovězeno Ing. Klčová - teoretická východiska, formální stránka práce Prof. Mezník - formální úprava, český a anglický jazyk

Language of thesis

Czech

Faculty

Faculty of Business and Management

Department

Institute of Informatics

Study programme

System Engineering and Informatics

Study branch

Managerial Informatics

Composition of Committee

prof. RNDr. Ivan Mezník, CSc. (předseda)
doc. Ing. et Ing. Stanislav Škapa, Ph.D. (místopředseda)
Ing. Jiří Kříž, Ph.D. (člen)
Ing. Hana Klčová, Ph.D. (člen)
Ing. Lenka Smolíková, Ph.D. (člen)

Supervisor’s report
Ing. Jiří Kříž, Ph.D.

V rámci formálního uspřádání není plně dodržena směrnice včetně některých terminologických chyb. U některých kapitol chybí text, například na straně 39 kapitola 4.4.7 Monografie.
Jaké standardy formátů jsou používány pro monografie?
Evaluation criteria Mark
Meeting the objectives C
Selected procedure of the solution, the adequacy of the used methods D
The ability to interpret the results and to draw conclusions E
The practical usability of conclusions C
The thesis´s framework, formalities, used terminology and the professional level of language E
Using of information resources, including citations C

Grade proposed by supervisor: E

Reviewer’s report
RNDr. Tomáš Svoboda

Evaluation criteria Mark
Meeting the objectives A
Selected procedure of the solution, the adequacy of the used methods C
The ability to interpret the results and to draw conclusions B
The practical usability of conclusions A
The thesis´s framework, used terminology and the professional level of language D
Using of information resources B

Grade proposed by reviewer: B