English

3

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

Evaluation is based on the active participation at lectures and seminars, regular consultations, and final presentation of interpretative text (essay, article, study) or text and visual work (lecture, installation, exhibition).
Active participation, regular consultations, presentation of interpretation and evaluation. Missed classes will be compensated on another agreed with the students.
Upon the agreement with the teacher, the absences in the classroom can be compensated via online participation.

To gain the knowledge about the basic questions of interpretation of architecture, about selected types of interpretation and interpretation methods, as well as about non-methodical interpretation of architecture. The theoretical and practical experience in interpreting architectural works based on the collective lectures, seminars and consultations, and individual study of architectural work and literature.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

FRAMPTON, Kenneth; ASHLEY, Simone (Ed.). A Genealogy of Modern Architecture. A Comparative Critical Analysis of Built Form. Zürich: Lars Müller Publishers, 2015. ISBN 978-3037783696. (EN)
NORBERG-SCHULZ, Christian. Intentions in Architecture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1968. ISBN ‎ 978-0262640022. (EN)
HAYS, Michael (Ed.). Architecture Theory since 1969. New York: Columbia School of Architecture and Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998. ISBN 978-0262581882. (EN)
CONSTANT, Caroline. Eileen Gray. London: Phaidon, 2000. ISBN 978-0714839059. (EN)

Not applicable.

26 hours, optionally

Semester block schedule:

1. Introduction. Scientific interpretation of architectural works: method of critical close reading of the architecture of the 20th century, as it was formulated by Peter Eisenman in the books „Giuseppe Terragni – Trasformations, Decompositions, Critiques“ and „Ten Canonical Buildings“.
   Example 1–2: Giuseppe Terragni: Casa del Fascio / Profiles of texts: Luigi Moretti, Casa „Il Girasole“, 1947–1950. Assignment
2. Scientific interpretation of architecture by the comparative critical analysis method built forms by Kenneth Frampton. The relationship of Frampton's interpretation methods to his „A Critical History of Architecture in 20th century“. Questions, discussion and consultation of assignment
3. Scientific interpretation of architecture by „phenomenological“ method of Christian Norberg-Schulze. The relationship to his books „Intention in architecture“ and „Space, existence, architecture“
4. Pre-scientific interpretation of architecture on the point between non-methodological and methodological approach of Michael Hays. The relationship to his study „Critical Architecture. Between Culture and Form“, and the book „Architecture Theory since 1989 “. Questions, discussion and consultation of assignment
5. Pre-scientific interpretation of architecture outside the method: Beatriz Colomina and her critical interpretation of Loos's villas and the E.1027 villa from the architect Eileen Gray. The relationship between Colomina's critical interpretation to her book „Privacy and Publicity“ (1994) and to the discussion about sexuality and gender. A polemic against Joan Ockman and Mary McLeod
6. Non-scientific, artistic/architectural interpretation of E.1027 Villa by Eileen Gray and Jean Badovici. Scientific (historiographic) re-interpretation of American architect and historian Caroline Constant
7. Presentation of students' interpretations. Discussion and evaluation