Publication detail
Towards an Optimal Interest Point Detector for Measurements in Ultrasound Images
ZUKAL, M. BENEŠ, R. ČÍKA, P. ŘÍHA, K.
Original Title
Towards an Optimal Interest Point Detector for Measurements in Ultrasound Images
English Title
Towards an Optimal Interest Point Detector for Measurements in Ultrasound Images
Type
journal article - other
Language
en
Original Abstract
This paper focuses on the comparison of different interest point detectors and their utilization for measurements in ultrasound (US) images. Certain medical examinations are based on speckle tracking which strongly relies on features that can be reliably tracked frame to frame. Only significant features (interest points) resistant to noise and brightness changes within US images are suitable for accurate long-lasting tracking. We compare three interest point detectors - Harris-Laplace, Difference of Gaussian (DoG) and Fast Hessian - and identify the most suitable one for use in US images on the basis of an objective criterion. Repeatability rate is assumed to be an objective quality measure for comparison. We have measured repeatability in images corrupted by different types of noise (speckle noise, Gaussian noise) and for changes in brightness. The Harris-Laplace detector outperformed its competitors and seems to be a sound option when choosing a suitable interest point detector for US images. However, it has to be noted that Fast Hessian and DoG detectors achieved better results in terms of processing speed.
English abstract
This paper focuses on the comparison of different interest point detectors and their utilization for measurements in ultrasound (US) images. Certain medical examinations are based on speckle tracking which strongly relies on features that can be reliably tracked frame to frame. Only significant features (interest points) resistant to noise and brightness changes within US images are suitable for accurate long-lasting tracking. We compare three interest point detectors - Harris-Laplace, Difference of Gaussian (DoG) and Fast Hessian - and identify the most suitable one for use in US images on the basis of an objective criterion. Repeatability rate is assumed to be an objective quality measure for comparison. We have measured repeatability in images corrupted by different types of noise (speckle noise, Gaussian noise) and for changes in brightness. The Harris-Laplace detector outperformed its competitors and seems to be a sound option when choosing a suitable interest point detector for US images. However, it has to be noted that Fast Hessian and DoG detectors achieved better results in terms of processing speed.
Keywords
B-mode ultrasound, Gaussian noise, interest point detector, repeatability rate, speckle noise, speckle tracking
RIV year
2013
Released
16.12.2013
Publisher
Versita Open, Versita Ltd. London, Great Britain
Location
London, Great Britain
ISBN
1335-8871
Periodical
Measurement Science Review
Year of study
13
Number
6
State
SK
Pages from
329
Pages to
338
Pages count
10
Documents
BibTex
@article{BUT104060,
author="Martin {Zukal} and Radek {Beneš} and Petr {Číka} and Kamil {Říha}",
title="Towards an Optimal Interest Point Detector for Measurements in Ultrasound Images",
annote="This paper focuses on the comparison of different interest point detectors and their utilization for measurements in ultrasound (US) images. Certain medical examinations are based on speckle tracking which strongly relies on features that can be reliably tracked frame to frame. Only significant features (interest points) resistant to noise and brightness changes within US images are suitable for accurate long-lasting tracking. We compare three interest point detectors - Harris-Laplace, Difference of Gaussian (DoG) and Fast Hessian - and identify the most suitable one for use in US images on the basis of an objective criterion. Repeatability rate is assumed to be an objective quality measure for comparison. We have measured repeatability in images corrupted by different types of noise (speckle noise, Gaussian noise) and for changes in brightness. The Harris-Laplace detector outperformed its competitors and seems to be a sound option when choosing a suitable interest point detector for US images. However, it has to be noted that Fast Hessian and DoG detectors achieved better results in terms of processing speed.",
address="Versita Open, Versita Ltd. London, Great Britain",
chapter="104060",
doi="10.2478/msr-2013-0049",
howpublished="online",
institution="Versita Open, Versita Ltd. London, Great Britain",
number="6",
volume="13",
year="2013",
month="december",
pages="329--338",
publisher="Versita Open, Versita Ltd. London, Great Britain",
type="journal article - other"
}