Detail publikace

Problems of FEM Analysis of Magnetic Circuit

ROUPEC, J. KUBÍK, M. MAZŮREK, I. STRECKER, Z.

Originální název

Problems of FEM Analysis of Magnetic Circuit

Anglický název

Problems of FEM Analysis of Magnetic Circuit

Jazyk

en

Originální abstrakt

This paper compares four different approaches to modeling of magnetic circuit in the ANSYS software. The approaches differ in various inputs of magnetic field source and varying levels of axial symmetry. The accuracy and the solution time were the main evaluation criteria. The analysis was performed on a simple magnetic circuit. The analysis results were compared with measurements on experimental device that was made for this purpose. The results show that planar solution in ANSYS Classic is the fastest and the highly accurate approach. The problem solution such as 3D axisymmetric task with the definition of magnetic field source with the stranded type is the most accurate, but more time-consuming.

Anglický abstrakt

This paper compares four different approaches to modeling of magnetic circuit in the ANSYS software. The approaches differ in various inputs of magnetic field source and varying levels of axial symmetry. The accuracy and the solution time were the main evaluation criteria. The analysis was performed on a simple magnetic circuit. The analysis results were compared with measurements on experimental device that was made for this purpose. The results show that planar solution in ANSYS Classic is the fastest and the highly accurate approach. The problem solution such as 3D axisymmetric task with the definition of magnetic field source with the stranded type is the most accurate, but more time-consuming.

Dokumenty

BibTex 


@inproceedings{BUT102914,
  author="Jakub {Roupec} and Michal {Kubík} and Ivan {Mazůrek} and Zbyněk {Strecker}",
  title="Problems of FEM Analysis of Magnetic Circuit",
  annote="This paper compares four different approaches to modeling of magnetic circuit in the ANSYS software. The approaches differ in various inputs of magnetic field source and varying levels of axial symmetry. The accuracy and the solution time were the main evaluation criteria. The analysis was performed on a simple magnetic circuit. The analysis results were compared with measurements on experimental device that was made for this purpose. The results show that planar solution in ANSYS Classic is the fastest and the highly accurate approach. The problem solution such as 3D axisymmetric task with the definition of magnetic field source with the stranded type is the most accurate, but more time-consuming.",
  address="Springer",
  booktitle="Mechatronics 2013 - Recent Technological and Scientific Advances",
  chapter="102914",
  doi="10.1007/978-3-319-02294-9",
  howpublished="print",
  institution="Springer",
  year="2013",
  month="october",
  pages="299--305",
  publisher="Springer",
  type="conference paper"
}